Reviewed: Born Rich

October 19, 2010

Born Rich is Johnson & Johnson heir Jamie Johnson’s sophomoric documentary about youthful privilege, and privileged youth. Its main vehicle is interviews conducted by Johnson of his friends, throughout the course of which each reveals him- or herself generally incompetent of anything worthwhile and frighteningly removed from consequence and reality.

The documentary is also an interview with Johnson: the audience, presented with an ungodly tableau of wealth and ease, questions it all. How did you get it? Do you appreciate it? What do you think about it? What are you doing with it? Do you know what it’s like to do without? And Johnson, by dint of recurring monologue, makes an attempt at answers, but falls flat. Most of his commentary ends with a question mark and nothing is resolved.

Not only is nothing resolved… nothing is interesting. The film is the live-action version of gossip page photographs. There’s a slight, superficial glimpse into an exotic world full of shiny animals, but no real substance. No close examination in any particular direction, no hard questions.

In one scene, Johnson asks his father for life advice. Specifically, what should he do with his? The advice is to consider graduate school of some type and, failing that, to think about taking up an interest in collecting antique maps and historic documents. The detached whimsy of collecting conversation-starters is vintage WASP, frivolity imbued with a Patrician sense of civic-minded preservation, and Johnson’s film hints that he agrees: the suggestion seems to strike him as ridiculous. There’s a chance he’ll want to do something productive and commendable with his life, and the audience almost applauds.

That commendable life never takes form. The film ends in a celebration of Johnson’s twenty-first birthday: guests in tails pouring champagne. At midnight that night, Johnson is set to inherit his fortune.

Ironically, Johnson now writes a gossip column for Vanity Fair about, quelle surprise, jetsetters and the horsey set. It’s likely his entre with that caste earned him the appointment, because his abilities as a writer certainly didn’t.

For all his name-making at the expense of wealthy cohorts, Johnson doesn’t fall much farther from the free himself: the only appeal his film and column enjoy, they derive from his last name, not from any natural skill of his own. There’s a metaphor there.

Born Rich and Johnson’s column (which generally totals two paragraphs, once a month), are each disappointing in comparison to their potential. What might have been an interesting, or at least entertaining, anthropologist’s window into a weird culture is squandered and lost in a disjointed search for direction. Lots of parties and expensive clothing, and a vague notion that there ought to be meaning or purpose somewhere or other but no real search for either. Perhaps in that way, the whole adventure is Johnson’s personal metaphor.

The main impression Born Rich leaves is that Jamie Johnson had a small attack of guilt at the hands of his money, purged himself with a half-assed “documentary” to prove he can see his world from afar, and then went on about his life, unchanged.

Think much? Drink more.

October 18, 2010

The website of The Atlantic magazine recently published an interesting chart having to do with the correlative relationship between the levels at which people’s brains function and how much they drink. The gist is surprising: on average, the smarter you are, the more you drink.

Drink_graphThe chart is based on years of research into British schoolchildren: “very bright” students participating in the study grew up to drink substantially more than their “very dull” classmates. The study controlled for “both income and education, as well as childhood social class and parents’ education.”

The logic behind the surprising results might be what English philosopher Michael Oakeshott called “the ordeal of consciousness”: the smarter the adult, the greater his need to occasionally disengage: high-functioning brains might sometimes need to unplug in the way that racehorses need to be walked off a track and back to the stables… they can’t run everywhere, all the time.

Gay Talese Travels Well

October 11, 2010


The Handlebar Club

October 7, 2010

The Handlebar Club was founded in Great Britain in the lat 1940s by actor Jimmy Edwards, of the Windmill Theatre. Initially joining Mr. Edwards were Frank Muir, of the BBC, and the Baron de Bere. Many founding members were ex- or serving members of the British armed forces, especially the R.A.F., to whom the anachronistic masculinity appealed.

Little information about the Club still survives, and most of what does is mainly conjecture and supposition. Still, one authentic photograph is still with us courtesy of LIFE Magazine:

Dartmouth Rugby Round-Up

October 4, 2010

The Dartmouth Rugby Football Club downed the University of Pennsylvania last weekend, at Penn, by a final tally of 78-7. The match was the first of the Ivy season for the DRFC, which also notched a 38-7 victory in a B-side match played later that day.

The next day saw Dartmouth in Princeton, New Jersey, rolling over the Tigers 52-3 amidst strong play by back Will Lehmann ’12 and DRFC co-captain Tommy Brothers ’11.

This past Saturday, Dartmouth took the pitch in New Haven, set to play the Bulldogs at Yale. Match reports aren’t yet in but Yale came into the came with a 2-0 record, similar to Dartmouth’s, after downing Ivy rivals Columbia and Cornell. Details forthcoming.  

A Learned Hand

October 3, 2010

An anonymous member of the Missouri Bar, recently questioned about his elegant signature (well-known and easily identifiable to local jurists), had this to say:

“We call the law a learned profession, and the rules of ethics by which we govern it place a great deal of emphasis on the appearance of propriety. It is near-impossible to appear either learned or proper when you sign your name like a child.”